Democracia y Medio ambiente: enfoques ambientales predominantes en los discursos científicos sobre democracia ambiental, verde, ecológica y sostenible
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33237/2236-255X.2023.4641Palabras clave:
Democracia verde, Democracia ecológica, Democracia sostenible, Democracia ambiental, Enfoques ambientalesResumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo identificar los enfoques ambientales predominantes, a partir de las formas analíticas de Foladori y Sauvé, en los discursos científicos que tratan de la relación entre democracia y medio ambiente, considerando las denominaciones democracia ambiental, verde, ecológica y sostenible. Para eso, fue utilizada la pesquisa de abordaje cualitativo y descriptivo, con corpus constituido por el método de revisión integrativa, siendo considerados 61 artículos (discursos científicos) cuyos datos fueron tratados por el análisis interpretativo e identificación de abordajes ambientales. Al final, se observó que al unir dos constructos (democracia y medio ambiente) que tienen marcas discursivas de participación, acción humana y efectos sobre los sistemas ecológicos, los discursos sobre democracias verdes, ecológicas, sustentables y ambientales en la forma analítica de Foladori (2000) tienen una tendencia predominantemente antropocentrista con énfasis en el pensamiento marxista, En la forma analítica de Sauvé (2005) los discursos son predominantes en las corrientes recientes, destacándose los enfoques crítico, praxis, bioregionalista y de sustentabilidad, debido a la propia incidencia de los discursos ambientales, que han cobrado fuerza a partir de la década de 1990, en diferentes actores y debates internacionales sobre las relaciones sociedad-naturaleza.
Descargas
Citas
ADINOLFI, V. T. S. Discurso científico, poder e verdade. Revista Aulas. n.3, 2007.
ALY, S. S. A., AMER, M. S. E. Public involvement in sustainable development: A public participation process in the sidi gaber railway station development project, Alexandria, Egypt. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 150, pp. 537-552, 2011.
ANTAL, A. The impact of U.S.A. and E.U. on environmental and energy democracy in Hungary. Online Journal Modelling the New Europe. n. 17, v. 1, pp. 13-27, 2015.
ARIAS-MALDONADO, M. The democratisation of sustainability: The search for a green democratic model. Environmental Politics. n. 9, v. 4, pp. 43-58, 2000.
ARIAS-MALDONADO, M. An imaginary solution? the green defence of deliberative democracy. Environmental Values. n. 16, v. 2, 233-252, 2007.
ARMIERO, M.; D'ALISA, G. Rights of resistance: The garbage struggles for environmental justice in campania, Italy. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism. n. 23, v. 4), 52-68, 2012.
ARORA-JONSSON, S. Policy discourses and marginal places: Histories of environmental democracy in India and Sweden. Social Sciences. n. 6, v. 1, art. no. 33, 2017.
BAKHTIN, M. Os gêneros do discurso. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.
BANGURA, Y. Authoritarian rule and democracy in Africa: a theoretical discourse Authoritarianism, democracy, and adjustment, UNRISD (ISSN: 1012-6511), pp. 39-82, 1992.
BOTELHO, L. L. R.; CUNHA, C. C. A.; MACEDO, M. O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade. Belo Horizonte, n.5, v. 11, p. 121-136, 2011.
BURSZTYN, M. A.; BURSZTYN, M. Fundamentos de política e gestão ambiental: caminhos para a sustentabilidade. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2013.
CASTRO-BUITRAGO, E., VALENCIA, F. C. Um direito ambiental democrático para a América Latina e o Caribe: Os desafios da negociação do acordo regional sobre o princípio 10 do rio 92. ACDI Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional. n. 11, pp. 163-190, 2018.
CIDADE, L. C. F. A questão ambiental urbana: perspectivas de análise. In: Encontro Nacional da ANPUR, 1996, Brasília. Anais do ANPUR. Brasília, 1996.
CROSSEN, T., NIESSEN, V. NGO standing in the European Court of Justice - Does the Aarhus Regulation open the door?. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. n. 16, v. 3, pp. 332-340, 2007.
DRYZEK, J. S. Political and Ecological Communication. Environmental Politics. n. 4, v. 4, pp. 13-30, 1995.
DRYZEK, J. S.; STEVENSON, H. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics. n. 70, v. 11, pp. 1865-1874, 2011.
DRYZEK, J.S.; DOWNES, D.; HUNOLD, C.; SCHLOSBERG, D.; HERNES, H. K. Green States and Social Movements:Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003.
ECKERSLEY, R. The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.
ECKERSLEY, R. From the liberal to the green democratic state: Upholding autonomy and sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development. n. 1, v. 4, pp. 266-283, 2006.
ECKERSLEY, R. Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics, n. 21, 1–21, 2019.
ESCRIHUELA, C. M. La democracia ecológica: Fundamento, posibilidades, actores. Revista de Estudios Politicos. n. 162, pp. 175-198, 2014.
ESCRIHUELA, C. M. Should ecological citizenship advocates praise the green state?. Environmental Values. n. 24, v.3, pp. 321-344, 2015.
ESTENSSORO, J. F. Historia del debate ambiental en la politica mundial 1945-1992: La Perspectiva Latinoamericana. Chile: Instituto de Estudios Avanzados/ Universidad Santiago de Chile, 2014.
ESTENSSORO, J. F. El factor ambiental en los debates ideológicos en torno al desarrollo de América Latina. História Unisinos. n. 21, v. 1, 13-25, 2017.
ETEMIRE, U. Insights on the UNEP Bali Guidelines and the development of environmental democratic rights. Journal of Environmental Law, n. 28, v. 3, pp. 393-413, 2016.
FABER, D.; McCARTHY, D. The evolving structure of the environmental justice movement in the United States: New models for democratic decision-making. Social Justice Research, n. 14, v. 4, pp. 405-421, 2001.
FOLADORI, G. El pensamiento ambientalista. Revista de Estudos Ambientais, 2(1):42-60. Tópicos en Educación Ambiental. n. 2, v. 5, 21-38, 2000.
FOLADORI, G; TAKS, J. (2004). Um olhar antropológico sobre a questão ambiental. Mana. Rio de Janeiro, n. 10, v. 2. 323-348, 2004.
GAARD, G. Women, water, energy: An ecofeminist approach. Organization and Environment. n. 14, v. 2, 157-172, 2001.
GBADAMOSI, O.; ADEWOYE, O. I. The rule of law as a catalyst for sustainable democracy in Nigeria. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, n. 36, v. 2, pp. 343-355, 2010.
GBEREVBIE, D. E.; OVIASOGIE, F.O. Women in governance and sustainable democracy in Nigeria, 1999-2012. Economics and Sociology, n. 6, v. 1, pp. 89-107, 2013.
GELLERS, J. C.; JEFFORDS, C. Toward environmental democracy? Procedural environmental rights and environmental justice. Global Environmental Politics. n. 18, v. 1, pp. 99-121, 2018.
GIUPPONI, B. O. Fostering environmental democracy in latin america and the caribbean: An analysis of the regional agreement on environmental access rights. Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, n. 28, v. 2, pp. 136-151, 2019.
GLUSHKOVA, M. Uma análise comparativa do discurso científico-político-empresarial no Brasil e na Rússia. Alfa: Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto), São Paulo, v. 62, n. 3, p. 447-468, 2018.
GOODIN, R. Green Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 1992.
HABERMAS, J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
HAMMOND, M. A cultural account of ecological democracy. Environmental Values, n. 28, v.1, pp. 55-74, 2019.
HELD, D. Models of Democracy. 3. ed. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press/Polity Press, 2006.
HOGGETT, P. Democracy, Social Relations and Ecowelfare. Social Policy and Administration, n. 35, v. 5, 608–626, 2001.
HOUSER, N. O. Ecological democracy: An environmental approach to citizenship education. Theory and Research in Social Education. n. 37, v. 2, pp. 192-214, 2009.
HUH, T.; KIM, Y.; KIM, J. H. Towards a green state: A comparative study on OECD countries through fuzzy-set analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland). n. 10, v. 9, art. n. 3181, 2018.
HUNOLD, C. Green political theory and the European Union: The case for a non-integrated civil society. Environmental Politics. n. 14, v. 3, pp. 324-343, 2005.
HYSING, E. Representative democracy, empowered experts, and citizen participation: Visions of green governing. Environmental Politics. n. 22, v. 6, pp. 955-974, 2013.
JEONG, H. W. Economic reform and democratic transition in Ghana. World Affairs. n. 160, v. 4, pp. 218-230, 1998.
KISS, G. Why should the public participate in environmental decision-making?: Theoretical arguments for public participation. Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences. n. 22, v. 1, pp. 13-20, 2014.
KOTHARI, A. (2009). Radical ecological democracy: Escaping India's globalization trap. Development. n. 52, v. 3, pp. 401-409, 2009.
KOTHARI, A. India 2100: Towards Radical Ecological Democracy (2014) Futures. n. 56, pp. 62-72, 2014a.
KOTHARI, A. Radical Ecological Democracy: A path forward for India and beyond. Development (Basingstoke). n. 57, v. 1, pp. 36-45, 2014b.
KOTHARI, A.; DEMARIA, F.; ACOSTA, A. Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy. Development (Basingstoke). n. 57, v. 3, pp. 362-375, 2014.
LAWRENCE, A.; PAUDEL, K.; BARNES, R.; MALLA, Y. Adaptive value of participatory biodiversity monitoring in community forestry. Environmental Conservation, n. 33, v. 4, pp. 325-334, 2006.
LEE, S. H. The discursive politics of water: Interurban struggles in the Nakdong river catchment in South Korea. Urban Policy and Research. n. 20, v. 3, pp. 281-298, 2002.
LENZI, C. L. A política democrática da sustentabilidade: Os modelos deliberativo e associativo de democracia ambiental. Ambiente e Sociedade. n. 12, v. 1, pp. 19-36, 2009.
LEPORI, M. Towards a new ecological democracy: A critical evaluation of the deliberation paradigm within green political theory. Environmental Values. n. 28, v. 1, pp. 75-99, 2019.
LIMA, J. V. B. C.; NEVES, F. M.; RODRIGUES, L. P. Os usos discursivos da ciência e da tecnologia nas disputas políticas ambientais. Sociedade e Estado. n. 31, v. 2, 517-538, 2016.
LOPES, F. S.; SOARES, T. L.; MORAIS, L. A.; CARVALHO, E. F. Cartografia das correntes em educação ambiental na percepção de discentes em administração. In: SEABRA, G. (Ogs). Educação Ambiental - o desenvolvimento sustentável na economia globalizada. Ituiutaba: Barlavento, 2020.
LUES, L. Citizen participation as a contributor to sustainable democracy in South Africa. International Review of Administrative Sciences. n. 80, v. 4, pp. 789-807, 2014.
LYNN, F. M.; KARTEZ, J. D. Environmental democracy in action: The Toxics Release Inventory. Environmental Management. n. 18, v. 4, pp. 511-521, 1994.
MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Técnicas de pesquisa: planejamento e execução de pesquisa, amostragens e técnicas de pesquisa, elaboração, análise e interpretação de dados. 8. ed. São Paulo, SP: Atlas, 2021.
MARCUSCHI, L. A. Produção textual: análise de gêneros e compreensão. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial, 2008
MILLETT, Richard L. Sustainable democracy in Latin America: Prospects and problems. Small Wars & Insurgencies. n. 4, v. 3, 87–97, 1993.
MITCHELL, R. E. Environmental governance in Mexico: Two case studies of Oaxaca's community forest sector. Journal of Latin American Studies. n. 38, v. 3, pp. 519-548, 2006a.
MITCHELL, R. E. Green politics or environmental blues? Analyzing ecological democracy. Public Understanding of Science. n. 15, v. 4, pp. 459-480, 2006b.
MORAIS, L. A. Conselhos ambientais: Dinâmicas de participações no Território Açu-Mossoró (RN). Mossoró, RN: EDUERN, 2020.
MORAIS, L. A.; SIQUEIRA, E. S.; SIQUEIRA FILHO, V.; NEPOMUCENO, L. H. Dinâmica de participação social em Conselho Municipal de Meio Ambiente do Território Açu-Mossoró (RN): a realidade sob o prisma documental. Research, Society and Development. n. 10, v. 5, p. 1-19, 2021.
NAPLES, N. A. Sustaining Democracy: Localization, Globalization, and Feminist Praxis. Sociological Forum. n. 28, v.4, pp. 657-681, 2013.
NIEMEYER, S. Deliberation and ecological democracy: from citizen to global system. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. n. 2, p. 1–14, 2019.
PARKER, W. C. Curriculum for democracy. In: SODOR, R. (Ed.). Democracy, education, and the schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
PARKER, W. C. (Ed). Education for democracy: Contexts, curricula, assessments. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2002.
NÓBREGA JR., J. P. A Semidemocracia Brasileira: autoritarismo ou democracia?. Sociologias.n. 12, v. 23, 2010.
PICKERING, J.; PERSSON, Å. Democratising planetary boundaries: experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earth system governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. n. 1, 2019.
POTT, C. M.; ESTRELA, C. C. Histórico ambiental: desastres ambientais e o despertar de um novo pensamento. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, n. 89, p. 271–283, jan. 2017.
QADIR, S.; CLAPHAM, C.; GILLS, B. Sustainable democracy: Formalism vs substance. Third World Quarterly. n. 14, v. 3, pp. 415-422, 1993.
RAMLOGAN, R. Using the law to achieve environmental democracy and sustainable development: An elusive dream for Trinidad and Tobago. Electronic Green Journal, n. 30, 2010.
ROCHA, R. G. Ecoideologias associadas aos movimentos ambientais: contribuições para o campo da educação ambiental. Educar em Revista. n. 27, 55-73, 2006.
RODENHOFF, V. The Aarhus Convention and its implications for the 'institutions' of the European Community. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law. n. 11, v. 3, pp. 343-357, 2002.
SAUVÉ, L. Uma cartografia das correntes em Educação Ambiental. In: SATO, M.; CARVALHO, I. C. M. (Orgs.). Educação Ambiental - pesquisas e desafios. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2005.
SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo: Cortez, 2018.
SNEDDON, C.; FOX, C. River-basin politics and the rise of ecological and transnational democracy in Southeast Asia and Southern Africa. Water Alternatives. n. 1, v. 1, pp. 66-88, 2008.
SZULECKI, K. Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics. n. 27, v. 1, pp. 21-41, 2018.
TADAKI, M.; SINNER, J.; CHAN, K. M. A. Making sense of environmental values: A typology of concepts. Ecology and Society. n. 22, v. 1, 2017.
TAKACS, D. Whose voices count in biodiversity conservation? Ecological democracy in biodiversity offsetting, REDD+, and rewilding. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. n. 3, 1–16, 2019.
VAN DEN BURG, S. Informing or empowering? Disclosure in the United States and the Netherlands. Local Environment. n. 9, v. 4, pp. 367-381, 2004.
VANHALA, L. Shaping the Structure of Legal Opportunities: Environmental NGOs Bringing International Environmental Procedural Rights Back Home. Law and Policy. n. 40, v. 1, pp. 110-127, 2018.
VOLÓCHINOV, V. N. Marxismo e Filosofia da Linguagem: problemas do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017.
WHITE, D. F. Ecological Democracy, Just Transitions and a Political Ecology of Design. Environmental Values. n. 28, v. 1, 31–53, 2019.
WHITESIDE, K. H. The impasses of ecological representation. Environmental Values. n. 22, v. 3, pp. 339-358, 2013.
WHITESIDE, K. H.; BOY, D.; BOURG, D. France's 'Grenelle de l'environnement': Openings and closures in ecological democracy. Environmental Politics. n. 19, v. 3, pp. 449-467, 2010.
WILSON, H. Environmental democracy and the green state. Polity, n. 38, v. 2, pp. 375-386, 2006.
WONG, J. K. A dilemma of green democracy. Political Studies. n. 64, pp. 136-155, 2015.
ZHU, X.; ZHANG, L.; RAN, R.; MOL, A.P.J. Regional restrictions on environmental impact assessment approval in China: The legitimacy of environmental authoritarianism. Journal of Cleaner Production. n. 92, pp. 100-108, 2015.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 REVISTA GEOTEMAS
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que envían sus manuscritos a Geotemas declaran que el trabajo es un artículo original y no ha sido enviado para su publicación, total o parcial, en otra revista científica nacional o internacional o en otro vehículo de circulación. Los autores también declaran que están de acuerdo con la transferencia de los derechos de autor del artículo referido a la revista Geotemas (Universidad del Estado de Rio Grande do Norte), permitiendo publicaciones posteriores, siempre y cuando la fuente de su publicación esté asegurada. Finalmente, asumen la responsabilidad pública del artículo, conscientes de que cualquier cargo que surja de un reclamo de terceros con respecto a la autoría del trabajo puede aplicarse a ellos.
